Wiktionary talk:Votes/2016-08/Making usex the primary name in the wiki markup

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/2016-08/Making usex the primary name in the wiki markup. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/2016-08/Making usex the primary name in the wiki markup, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary talk:Votes/2016-08/Making usex the primary name in the wiki markup in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/2016-08/Making usex the primary name in the wiki markup you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/2016-08/Making usex the primary name in the wiki markup will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary talk:Votes/2016-08/Making usex the primary name in the wiki markup, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Rationale

Latest comment: 8 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Let me guess: usex as a name is clearer than ux. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:39, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

I prefer {{usage example}}, as long as it is just the template name (that is: {{ux}} redirects to {{usage example}}) and is not widely used in entries. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
I hope that the vote makes it clear by "to be used in the wiki markup" that this is about the name to be seen directly in entries. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:06, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Your previous votes usually said: "allowing automatic and semi-automatic edits". Maybe we could add this in this vote, too. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:17, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
I thought about it and after hesitation decided not to. Some people disliked that phrase, and "Making X the primary template name to be used in the wiki markup" seems to cover this and is more general since it covers also slow-moving manual edits as well. I may use the phrase you quote in the future, but I feel it is not necessary for this vote. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
That's fine with me. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia