maybe we should create votes to nominate new template editors? --Daniel Carrero (talk) 04:40, 13 September 2016 (UTC) The vote states that it would be...
References ^ Wiktionary:Votes/2006-12/form-of style ^ Wiktionary:Votes/2010-08/Italicizing use-with-mention ^ Wiktionary:Votes/2016-09/Definitions — non-lemma...
vote, since it has the larger ratio and that ratio meets the 2/3rds requirement, unless you're counting votes supporting one (current) logo as votes opposing...
comment/vote either on Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-01/Pronunciation or the respective talk page. I hope I didn't miss anyone. This new vote is scheduled to start in...
September 2016 (UTC) @Daniel Carrero: I think we should take this into consideration before starting the vote. --WikiTiki89 15:24, 23 September 2016 (UTC)...
if the current wording can be improved. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 22:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC) This seems to be an interesting and worthwhile idea, but can...
that get kind of repetitive? PseudoSkull (talk) 02:00, 1 October 2016 (UTC) If this vote passes and people want to keep these entries with a single AF section...
Votes that have not been closed. Templates used in votes: {{vote-generic}}, {{vote-sysop}}, {{vote-bureaucrat}}, {{vote-checkuser}}, {{vote-bot}};...
July 2016 (UTC) Dan's been on a spree of creating votes he opposes. --WikiTiki89 17:45, 25 July 2016 (UTC) I have a separate proposal. Create a new template...
07:31, 27 August 2016 (UTC) Actually, I agree with you. Your lack of cultural relativism is refreshing. --Vahag (talk) 09:32, 27 August 2016 (UTC) I apologize...