30 March 2018 (UTC) As for: "vote page doesn't include anything from those who posted votes to the initial thread": What should the vote page include...
March 2018 (UTC) @TheDaveRoss: There were no reaffirm votes, only desysop votes. Some Wikipedias have reaffirm votes. My point is that the desysop votes should...
maybe it's not the best example. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 10:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC) I don't think the rule has been ignored there, or even come into...
be moved to WT:ELE as it is not a guideline page's purpose to describe the usage of a form-of template.--Zcreator alt (talk) 09:43, 17 March 2018 (UTC)...
Polansky (talk) 23:13, 25 May 2018 (UTC) Let's consider Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2018-03/Including translation hubs. In that vote, the concerned editor wrote...
making votes and casting votes, not the minutiae of closing votes. This is a good point. It's not a rule, and we've let non-admins close votes before...
shifts to doing it one way or the other. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 03:06, 27 November 2018 (UTC) I agree on both counts; we should have a single format, and...
Votes that have not been closed. Templates used in votes: {{vote-generic}}, {{vote-sysop}}, {{vote-bureaucrat}}, {{vote-checkuser}}, {{vote-bot}};...
terminology anyway. --Dan Polansky (talk) 06:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC) Request for Clarification: Is this vote intended to apply to all languages? Or just Latin...
Wiktionary:Votes/2016-01/Uncle_G_for_de-sysop Wiktionary:Votes/2017-01/Dominic_for_de-admin Wiktionary:Votes/2017-02/Richardb_for_de-admin Wiktionary:Votes/2018-01/Conrad...