@Metaknowledge Do you have any idea? --Dine2016 (talk) 05:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC) This vote was terribly designed, and it failed to clarify consensus...
22 May 2019 (UTC) And my point was that it really should, Mihia, because people's votes may depend on that. For example, if we were to vote right now...
Egyptian but copying over transcriptions wrongly. Fay Freak (talk) 20:05, 11 May 2019 (UTC) Late comment, but for users who aren't editors (I believe these...
September 2019 (UTC) Is this a marketing thing, as in, "confirmation votes" is a gentler name for de-sysop votes? Personally, I would rather vote on a policy...
technically not votes? — SGconlaw (talk) 11:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC) Your question seems to be contain its own answer. This vote applies to votes, and polls...
rescinding. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC) My reason to oppose is in Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-03/Overturning COALMINE, starting with "I...
August 2019 (UTC) And in those rare cases, {{delete}} should be fine. I'm still inquiring re:"rollbacking or blocking" however. --{{victar|talk}} 18:05, 5...
Wikipedia uses straight instead of curly quotes are no longer relevant in 2019, April 2019 W:Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Revisiting curly quotes, again, May...
anyway. Though this is a side issue, not really relevant to this vote, .... my votes on the posts of the main page are the same regarldess of if Im right...
preexisting wording that is not even a policy. In the COALMINE vote you mention (Wiktionary:Votes/2019-08/Rescinding the "Coalmine" policy), the wording change...