July 2019 (UTC) @DCDuring: I'm not sure how you can cast a vote without even having a basic understanding of what we're voting on. If you read the vote page...
technically not votes? — SGconlaw (talk) 11:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC) Your question seems to be contain its own answer. This vote applies to votes, and polls...
ambiguous unless people specify in their votes what kind they're voting about.—msh210℠ (talk) 06:49, 23 May 2019 (UTC) The proposal, as stated, is that...
The purpose of these votes is to determine whether we desire a simple yes/no application of general idiomaticity rules to hyphenated compounds, or whether...
Polansky (talk) 17:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC) ^ Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-02/Renaming CFI section for spellings ^ Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-04/Keeping common misspellings...
because that's really what they are, in the end. --{{victar|talk}} 20:06, 6 July 2019 (UTC) @Victar: I know that you want not, here you see the defect English...
Wiktionary:Beer_parlour/2019/November#Include_"Reconstruction_notes"_and_"Alternative_reconstructions"_in_WT:EL?. --{{victar|talk}} 06:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)...
English, but is a form of it, so too is Scots. Leasnam (talk) 04:06, 25 February 2019 (UTC) Not everyone else does; the OED doesn't distinguish between...
@Fytcha: Wiktionary:Votes/2019-03/Excluding typos and scannos. PUC – 21:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC) @PUC: Thanks a lot, I wasn't aware. I'll read into it now...
consensus shifts to doing it one way or the other. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 03:06, 27 November 2018 (UTC) I agree on both counts; we should have a single format...