Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/2020-02/De-sysop votes to pass by simple majority. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/2020-02/De-sysop votes to pass by simple majority, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary talk:Votes/2020-02/De-sysop votes to pass by simple majority in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/2020-02/De-sysop votes to pass by simple majority you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/2020-02/De-sysop votes to pass by simple majority will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary talk:Votes/2020-02/De-sysop votes to pass by simple majority, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Relatedly, it's never made sense to me that you have to achieve consensus in RFD to delete an entry, but you also have to achieve consensus in the other way to recreate it. That's a weird and unacceptable asymmetry. Canonicalization (talk) 12:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
- I don't think that is related at all, to be honest. On a philosophical level, most entries that do not exist should not exist (that is, most permutations of valid inputs are not words in any language), and most entries that do exist should exist (that is, a very small fraction of entries should be sent to RFD or RFV). As for this vote, nobody "should" be an admin; it's an extra responsibility, and carries with it potential for unchecked misuse that this vote seeks to address. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 17:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply