Wiktionary talk:Votes/2020-07/Adding topa to all Proto-Slavic descendants sections

@Rua It's unclear what this poll stands for. There are questionable definitions:

• Statement 1: "Adding topa: Can you point me to the vote where this was approved?"
  • 1.1 What is issue: columns in general OR specific template?
• Statement 2: "Adding <...> the template {{topa}} or some other columnising template to the descendants section of all Proto-Slavic entries."
  • 2.1. "Adding": is it permission OR intention/goal (may/can be added OR should/shall/must be added)?
  • 2.2. "all Proto-Slavic entries": absolutely all OR all appropriate/suitable?
  • 2.3. "{{topa}} or some other columnizing template": what exactly AND what are the rest?
• Statement 3: "<...> descendants divided into columns for every user, including unregistered users"
  • 3.1. What is issue: presence of columnizing template OR appearance/look of list (in descendants)? —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 17:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

The vote text states: "This vote codifies whether Proto-Slavic entries should, as a matter of agreement, always have their descendants divided into columns for every user, including unregistered users." —Rua (mew) 13:19, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the "(Votes for this option also count for the previous two)" condition from the "Support unconditionally" option, as a condition is not unconditional. If people want to support either gadget option, they can vote for both. The "(Votes for this option also count for the previous one)" bit under "Support, with columns by default, opt-out through a gadget" should also be removed. --{{victar|talk}} 04:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've undone your changes, as that's not how the vote is written and the vote has already started. —Rua (mew) 08:09, 3 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

This vote is illegitimate. It was never added to the upcoming votes list for clearly that reason. --{{victar|talk}} 04:19, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply