Wiktionary talk:Votes/2021-07/Deleting the Index

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/2021-07/Deleting the Index. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/2021-07/Deleting the Index, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary talk:Votes/2021-07/Deleting the Index in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/2021-07/Deleting the Index you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/2021-07/Deleting the Index will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary talk:Votes/2021-07/Deleting the Index, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Hi! I certainly have seen the Index pages being superseded by the Lemma category in my time here. But is it possible to demonstrate that the old stuff really isn't required? For example, are there incoming links, etc. etc. Equinox 02:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Since I removed the links to it from the main page in 2018 per a BP discussion, I think the only significant main namespace linkage comes from Finnish lemmas. See e.g. the top of varpunen. Ultimateria (talk) 03:09, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Should I mention removing incoming links in the vote? It seemed pretty obvious to me (and those Finnish links aren't approved by our layout rules anyway). —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Probably fine. I only wanted to double-check that it had been considered. Thanks. Equinox 04:56, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Another big source is the box in category pages, e.g. Category:English language. I don't know how to remove it, unfortunately. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 06:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Those are added by Module:category tree/poscatboiler/data/languages, so it should just be a simple edit. — Eru·tuon 06:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Ultimateria Just a note, but they are still linked from the very top of the main page under ‘Browse: All langauges’. — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 18:59, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Good catch, I'd never even thought to click on that. I'll replace that link with Category:All languages unless anyone has another suggestion. Ultimateria (talk) 19:09, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Do they delete namespaces?

Not sure if the Wikimedia folks do delete namespaces. Wikipedia has the Gadget and Gadget definition namespaces (and their talk namespaces), which are unused but haven't been deleted. But at least they could mark the Index namespace as deprecated, as was done with the Wikipedia namespaces. — Eru·tuon 06:45, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Erutuon: This would be good to find out for sure. I was planning on designating you as the person to handle the Phabricator side of things anyway... —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 19:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Erutuon: I inquired and the answer is yes, they do delete namespaces. Gadget is a special case because of its extension. Here is the Phab report that en.wiki recently used to delete the Book namespace. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 20:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Metaknowledge: Okay, good to know, and yes, I think I can write the Phabricator task. — Eru·tuon 23:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Presentation

I like the way the index is formatted, it's much more functional than the lemma categories, and restores some of that random paper dictionary experience. And it contains red links, useful to spot holes. (useful for editors, that is). But generating this for every language, with the current size of the dictionary seems like a monster undertaking. – Jberkel 19:10, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

User:Matthias Buchmeier has made some of these from translation sections (see his userpage), if that's really all you want. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 19:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Not bad, but it doesn't have redlinks, and the entries are duplicated (one line per POS). – Jberkel 23:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Last I checked, it did have redlinks, and they're more likely to be reliable than the Index ones, which are horribly outdated and often reflect deleted entries. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 02:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
It does have redlinks, but only from English-Other language. – Jberkel 22:50, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Some statistics on linking to index pages here. Quite a few links to nonexistent index pages. It's possible most links are generated by modules or templates. At least that is true of links to subpages of Index:index/ (see Special:WhatLinksHere/Index:index/a), and probably true of links to Index:Chinese Cangjie and its subpages (Special:Search/insource:"Chinese cangjie").

Not too many pages transclude indices. Quite a few transclude themselves (query), and a few user pages transclude index pages (query). — Eru·tuon 23:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

American Sign Language

User:AG202 mentioned on Discord that Index:American Sign Language is probably worth keeping. So we can leave it when we move everything to the Appendix namespace. — Eru·tuon 23:00, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wherefore need we to? I see that that index page lists no terms… ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 08:27, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
@AG202, can you answer this? I just took a look and it seems like a good idea, but there's hardly anything there... —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:12, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Pinging @Inqilābī as well. Yea I think it'd be good thing to move it to the Appendix. At first glance, it doesn't look like much, but some pages like Index:American_Sign_Language/AIS have more detailed information, so I think it'd be best to preserve it, especially considering the work that probably went into it. I'm not a speaker of ASL myself, but I'd feel bad removing useful information like that. AG202 (talk) 05:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Same. Some work went into it. More like the picture dictionaries in spoken languages — of course due to the sign languages’ nature, but still it is more like these picture dictionaries and less like the crap for which this namespace was deleted. Fay Freak (talk) 04:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply