attempt at approval voting had a high death rate, so … —RuakhTALK 23:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC) Just for the record, I'd be #2. And yes, votes with more than...
should IMHO not be done without vote: Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/curly_quotes_in_WT:ELE. I really think that voting on every change is not only the most...
In the future, when there are multiple options, a vote design more like Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-04/WMF jargon might work better. Dominic·t 14:17, 3 September...
been left unspecified. As someone pointed out in the previous vote (Wiktionary:Votes/2012-04/Languages with limited documentation), endangered languages...
free to discuss its conclusions. Old vote on attestation criteria Dan Polansky is asking me about Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-12/Attestation criteria which...
common misspellings. We have Category:English misspellings since 10 March 2008 (it was named different before, I think) with 1,594 entries, and we have...
Stubborn 2008-04-13 T 06:34 UTC Seem fine to me, although then again a category would probably be sufficient. -- Visviva 06:46, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Hi...
struggle to understand its purpose. But with sign languages, Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-08/Wiktionary:About_sign_languages says "relaxes WT:CFI for these rarely...
one of whom has 'left the project'. So, why should Wikipedian votes be less valid than votes by people with no knowledge of the language or situation? "I'm...
March 2008 (UTC) Okay, I finished with the last template. They should all be good now (for [pos/neg imperatives, anyway). Ian Burnet 04:44, 7 March 2008 (UTC)...