10 Results found for "Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl-2009-03".

Wiktionary talk:Entry layout/Editable

User:Msh210/ELE Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 1 Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 2 Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 3 How about...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 1

rewrite it in this vote also, the combined outcomes of the votes might become ambiguous or unclear. It would be possible to rewrite the votes in a way that...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 3

which can only be modified by going through all this rigmarole again. -- Visviva 06:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Thanks. —RuakhTALK 15:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC)...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2012-03/Minor ELE fix

did: unpass Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/Removing vote requirements for policy changes create Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-03/Vote requirements for policy...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-03/Context labels in ELE

tried to address that by making a much-abbreviated version 2 at Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/Context labels in ELE v2. —Michael Z. 2009-05-17 18:11 z...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/Timeline

Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-08/Voting eligibility 2 does not pass Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-08/User:MalafayaBot for bot status passes Wiktionary:Votes/2009-08/Rename...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-08/Voting eligibility

another vote, Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-08/Voting eligibility 2 ? --Ivan Štambuk 03:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC) Either one sounds find to me. —Stephen 03:51,...


Wiktionary talk:Context labels

Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/Context labels in ELE. More appropriate for this technical guideline than for a core policy. —Michael Z. 2009-05-17 17:57 z...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-08/Voting eligibility 2

it. --Ivan Štambuk 13:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC) With the introduction of sub-votes, is one user entitled to vote in one or in both of them? The uſer hight...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-12/Addition of Examples header to ELE

(except me and DAVilla) so they can confirm or change their votes, extend the time of the vote, and continue from there?​—msh210℠ 16:09, 18 January 2010...