Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 3. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 3, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 3 in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 3 you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 3 will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 3, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
So is the implication that we'd write
# ]
# {{slang}} ]., because one definition line "consists solely of a term that can be directly substituted for the headword", while the other one also has a context label? If not — and even if so — I think we need some examples. —RuakhTALK 15:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
- Good point; I've changed "definition line" to "definition". I've also added a modified version of your example, but only to the explanatory section of the vote. Here's my thinking: if we change our general approach to policy -- as I hope we will -- so that non-controversial examples can be added and modified by consensus, then the examples won't need to be VOTEd in anyway; if not, then frankly I'd rather have no examples at all than be stuck with examples that will eventually become obsolete but which can only be modified by going through all this rigmarole again. -- Visviva 06:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks. —RuakhTALK 15:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply