10 Results found for "Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl-2009-06".

Wiktionary talk:Votes/Timeline

2005 (UTC)) Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-08/Voting eligibility retracted, see below for Voting eligibility 2 Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-06/Unified Serbo-Croatian...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-08/Voting eligibility

should I simply start another vote, Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-08/Voting eligibility 2 ? --Ivan Štambuk 03:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC) Either one sounds find...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-06/Unified Serbo-Croatian

DCDuring TALK 09:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC) Are you now saying we have no business voting? - anyone can vote. However, votes coming out of complete ignorance...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-08/Voting eligibility 2

it. --Ivan Štambuk 13:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC) With the introduction of sub-votes, is one user entitled to vote in one or in both of them? The uſer hight...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 3

which can only be modified by going through all this rigmarole again. -- Visviva 06:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Thanks. —RuakhTALK 15:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC)...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-08/Common placenames get entries

withdraw the vote Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-08/Common placenames get entries, by placing a note to the vote that says that you withdraw the vote. As you know...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-05/Names of specific entities

at least, I personally would be more likely to vote for it in that case.—msh210℠ 15:19, 4 May 2009 (UTC) The idea is to avoid citing every single name...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2010-06/Number vs. numeral

the vote Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/Removing vote requirements for policy changes. Various people have voiced support for a lower threshold in votes that...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/2019-03/Defining a supermajority for passing votes

Serbo-Croatian editors who voted oppose in Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-06/Unified Serbo-Croatian want to become eligible for voting, they practically can; and...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2009-12/Definition layout

means the current proposal on the vote page is missing the most important point.) —RuakhTALK 04:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC) The "Foreign-language lemma...