should I simply start another vote, Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-08/Voting eligibility 2 ? --Ivan Štambuk 03:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC) Either one sounds find...
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-08/Voting eligibility 2 does not pass Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-08/User:MalafayaBot for bot status passes Wiktionary:Votes/2009-08/Rename...
it. --Ivan Štambuk 13:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC) With the introduction of sub-votes, is one user entitled to vote in one or in both of them? The uſer hight...
withdraw the vote Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-08/Common placenames get entries, by placing a note to the vote that says that you withdraw the vote. As you know...
derived words, they may have synonyms, anagrams, etc. They should be described as words, because they are words. Lmaltier 16:48, 8 September 2009 (UTC)...
all these changes? Or is it manual work? --Rising Sun 09:54, 4 September 2009 (UTC) I'm a bit confused by this. I supposed I've always assumed that people...
did: unpass Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/Removing vote requirements for policy changes create Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-03/Vote requirements for policy...
→ ¢ • τ 00:44, 20 December 2009 (UTC) Possibly "Illustrations" as Visviva suggests. --Bequw → ¢ • τ 08:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC) Yeah, either of those...
at least, I personally would be more likely to vote for it in that case.—msh210℠ 15:19, 4 May 2009 (UTC) The idea is to avoid citing every single name...
the guidelines outlined in the proposal policy WT:ASH. Lmaltier 08:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC) It would be misleading to imply that we're somehow "prohibiting"...