(except me and DAVilla) so they can confirm or change their votes, extend the time of the vote, and continue from there?—msh210℠ 16:09, 18 January 2010...
Here is the Beer Parlor discussion: I am preparing the a vote at Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-12/Treatment of toneless pinyin syllables, regarding our options...
20:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC) As no one other than the proposer has voted yet, I think it would be a good idea to freeze the vote until the specific text...
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-08/Voting eligibility 2 does not pass Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-08/User:MalafayaBot for bot status passes Wiktionary:Votes/2009-08/Rename...
translation seems quite appropriate to me. --Ivan Štambuk 13:03, 30 December 2009 (UTC) Good point. More generally, when I wrote the text, I only had lemma...
should I simply start another vote, Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-08/Voting eligibility 2 ? --Ivan Štambuk 03:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC) Either one sounds find...
aren't two separate votes, are there? Mglovesfun (talk) 11:18, 13 January 2010 (UTC) Can this vote please be renamed as Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-01/Renaming...
it. --Ivan Štambuk 13:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC) With the introduction of sub-votes, is one user entitled to vote in one or in both of them? The uſer hight...
Bogorm 10:05, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 9-8 is fail, not pass, in Wiktionary votes. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 10:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Where is the rule? Do...
Štambuk 20:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC) I'd like an explicit renunciation by all of the threat, due to my lack of a sense of humor when it comes to votes. In a case...