Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-02/Disallowing translations for English inflected forms

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-02/Disallowing translations for English inflected forms. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-02/Disallowing translations for English inflected forms, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-02/Disallowing translations for English inflected forms in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-02/Disallowing translations for English inflected forms you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-02/Disallowing translations for English inflected forms will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-02/Disallowing translations for English inflected forms, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Checking

Can someone please check this entirely, as it is hard to proof read your own work. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

In the examples, you should probably mention plurals too. Unless I missed it. Ƿidsiþ 12:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Alternative spellings should not have translations

Vahagn Petrosyan (talkcontribs) mentioned this. Obviously that would be a separate vote, but not needed IMO. That's what {{trans-see}} is for. Seems perfectly reasonable to want to have all the translations in a single translation table, rather than split randomly over several. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:56, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead, then, merge the translations at behaviour and behavior. See what happens. --Vahag 14:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
That's to some extent a separate issue - which is an alternative spelling of which? When it comes to entries using {{alternative spelling of|foo}} I don't think there's an issue - but when neither spelling is considered secondary, the issue you bring up is there. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply