Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-06/Single lowercase entry in situations where both cases are present

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-06/Single lowercase entry in situations where both cases are present. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-06/Single lowercase entry in situations where both cases are present, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-06/Single lowercase entry in situations where both cases are present in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-06/Single lowercase entry in situations where both cases are present you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-06/Single lowercase entry in situations where both cases are present will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-06/Single lowercase entry in situations where both cases are present, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Linking

Why not link more prominently to the alternative spelling? We could do it the way Wikipedia does it on w:Dictionary. At the top of the language section we could have a heading that says, for example, 'for the name, see (capitalised version)'. —CodeCat 00:04, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

As another editor pointed out, you could have a lot of difference in variants, for example ipecac, iPod, IPO, Ipanema, so their might not be a consistency for where the capital letter appears in a word. Sometimes first, sometimes other places, sometimes not at all. My suggestion would simplify that substantially so that you just type the word and all variants appear on one page. This is how all other parts of speech are done, and apparently many people make the exception essentially just for 1 part of speech, the proper noun. While this makes sense if the proper noun is the *only* version extant, it seems silly to have people click yet another link, when the information can be presented immediately in the same page *and* is currently done so for every other part of speech. -- Avanu 06:51, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply