written <span class="searchmatch">in</span> unused <span class="searchmatch">scripts</span>. - -sche (discuss) 23:32, 7 August <span class="searchmatch">2011</span> (UTC) Nevertheless, <span class="searchmatch">in</span> my opinion it's easier to <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> on a <span class="searchmatch">language</span> or on a list <span class="searchmatch">of</span> languages...
this <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> to anything more explanatory, such as from Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/<span class="searchmatch">pl</span>-2010-12/CFI amendment (2) to Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/<span class="searchmatch">pl</span>-2010-12/Attestation <span class="searchmatch">of</span> extinct...
be/is written <span class="searchmatch">in</span> <span class="searchmatch">Roman</span>, anyway or there are various <span class="searchmatch">scripts</span> used". Is this <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> to promote the POV that Sanskrit can and should be written <span class="searchmatch">in</span> Latin (i.e...
On mentions, see also Wiktionary_talk:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/<span class="searchmatch">pl</span>-<span class="searchmatch">2011</span>-05/Attestation_<span class="searchmatch">of</span>_extinct_<span class="searchmatch">languages</span>#Use or mention thread <span class="searchmatch">in</span> particular, with its 1295 words. --Dan...
other <span class="searchmatch">languages</span>" instead. On the other hand, Greek, Arabic, and Hindi entries offer only one kind <span class="searchmatch">of</span> <span class="searchmatch">romanization</span>, so the <span class="searchmatch">romanization</span> is simply put <span class="searchmatch">in</span> the...
code "frs", but the name "Saterland Frisian". - -sche (discuss) 19:<span class="searchmatch">08</span>, 17 October <span class="searchmatch">2011</span> (UTC) To me it seems like Saterland Frisian is the most common name...
October <span class="searchmatch">2011</span> (UTC) I guess template:he-infinitive <span class="searchmatch">of</span>, too.—msh210℠ (talk) 19:<span class="searchmatch">08</span>, 17 October <span class="searchmatch">2011</span> (UTC) Do <span class="searchmatch">Ancient</span> Hebrew words <span class="searchmatch">in</span> Phoenician <span class="searchmatch">script</span> get entries...
collectively. --Ivan Štambuk 07:18, 30 June 2009 (UTC) I've created a <span class="searchmatch">vote</span>: Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/<span class="searchmatch">pl</span>-2009-06/Unified Serbo-Croatian --Ivan Štambuk 07:43, 30 June 2009...
either: drop <span class="searchmatch">romanization</span> for Korean words, and just supply a pronunciation (either <span class="searchmatch">in</span> the style I'm using here or IPA or both); keep <span class="searchmatch">romanization</span> but also...
they're simply variants <span class="searchmatch">of</span> the same letter <span class="searchmatch">in</span> Latin. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:48, 8 April <span class="searchmatch">2011</span> (UTC) Yes, "j" is just an "alternative-form-<span class="searchmatch">of</span>" "i", and all our...