02:01, 3 October 2011 (UTC) Yes, we should document the systems to be used. I've removed languages with complex systems from this vote and begun to tabulate...
interpret the vote I wrote as allowing this discretion (th, þ, ƕ and hw are all traditional Romanizations). - -sche (discuss) 01:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC) A...
suggest renaming this vote to anything more explanatory, such as from Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/CFI amendment (2) to Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/Attestation...
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-05/Attestation of extinct languages 3 has failed, this vote can be opened. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:01, 1 August 2011 (UTC) The vote can...
parlour, he has little reason to believe that the vote is doomed to fail. --Dan Polansky 09:51, 23 March 2011 (UTC) I assume the "Oppose" option means "Templates...
13:56, 8 March 2011 (UTC) Go ahead, then, merge the translations at behaviour and behavior. See what happens. --Vahag 14:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC) That's to...
—RuakhTALK 19:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC) Please indicate whether you think this proposal has any effect on the outcome of Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-12/Treatment of...
recent Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-12/Merging_proper_nouns_into_nouns, whose rationale has 412 words, while my rationale for this vote has 217 words. I have...
2014 (UTC) IMO this vote should specify in its wording whether it means to override pl-2011-10/Romanization of Gothic and pl-2011-09/Romanization of languages...
(discuss) 09:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC) The vote has started: Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-10/Mixed script Mandarin entries. --Anatoli 04:27, 18 October 2011 (UTC)...