Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-09/Romanization of languages in ancient scripts 2. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-09/Romanization of languages in ancient scripts 2, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-09/Romanization of languages in ancient scripts 2 in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-09/Romanization of languages in ancient scripts 2 you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-09/Romanization of languages in ancient scripts 2 will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-09/Romanization of languages in ancient scripts 2, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Should we document which romanization schemes are to be allowed, or will that be self-evident to anyone familiar with the affected languages? (Or do we intend to simply allow all plausible romanization schemes?) —RuakhTALK 02:01, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
- Yes, we should document the systems to be used. I've removed languages with complex systems from this vote and begun to tabulate the standard systems for the simple-system languages. - -sche (discuss) 03:12, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
- Thanks! —RuakhTALK 03:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
- Statement of legislative intent: It is my intention that the editors of the specific languages decide the precise schemes of Romanization to be used, from the (narrow) range of traditional Romanizations (for example, sometimes s is used rather than ṣ, and s may be more appropriate in article names); and I interpret the vote I wrote as allowing this discretion. - -sche (discuss) 01:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply