--Anatoli 03:53, 10 October 2011 (UTC) lol, strange! - -sche (discuss) 21:39, 10 October 2011 (UTC) I see some issues with the vote. "[...] deemed standard...
should of course provide macrons in the headword line. —CodeCat 10:31, 3 October 2011 (UTC) According to the Gotische Grammatik by Braune and Ebbinghaus...
suggest renaming this vote to anything more explanatory, such as from Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/CFI amendment (2) to Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/Attestation...
(discuss) 09:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC) The vote has started: Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-10/Mixed script Mandarin entries. --Anatoli 04:27, 18 October 2011 (UTC)...
be the decision.—msh210℠ (talk) 16:44, 23 March 2011 (UTC) Formally speaking, I do no think that votes for option 1 and option 2 can really be added. But...
Lmaltier 21:51, 10 December 2011 (UTC) The "Rationale" section seems to answer at least some of these questions. Equinox ◑ 21:58, 10 December 2011 (UTC) I think...
—RuakhTALK 19:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC) Please indicate whether you think this proposal has any effect on the outcome of Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-12/Treatment of...
create another vote. (Vidēte how many votes have been held on attestation in extinct languages.) - -sche (discuss) 17:17, 21 August 2011 (UTC) Here is...
create a vote. If this vote fails, that is okay, even though I would like it to succeed. I do not understand why some people are so scared of votes that fail...
2012 (UTC) Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-12/Banning_Lojban_entries introduced an error, and would make the wording of CFI worse; this votes does not introduced...