this vote isn't starting too soon as we need to look for evidence and not 'jump the gun' and just vote on it. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:10, 11 December 2011 (UTC)...
renaming this vote to anything more explanatory, such as from Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/CFI amendment (2) to Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/Attestation of...
opposing this vote. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:39, 2 March 2012 (UTC) I'm afraid I have to disagree. You opposed the Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-12/Banning_Lojban_entries...
--Makaokalani 08:40, 13 December 2011 (UTC) FYI, {{en-noun|term|?}} is the option to omit the plural. —Michael Z. 2011-12-13 15:36 z I believe you're mistaken...
recent Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-12/Merging_proper_nouns_into_nouns, whose rationale has 412 words, while my rationale for this vote has 217 words. I have...
standard (for enwikt votes) supermajority among all voters or (2) it'll be only by which option has a standard (for enwikt votes) supermajority among...
--Anatoli 03:53, 10 October 2011 (UTC) lol, strange! - -sche (discuss) 21:39, 10 October 2011 (UTC) I see some issues with the vote. "[...] deemed standard...
familiar ones all seem to be natural languages. —RuakhTALK 18:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC) Looking through Wikipedia, it seems that virtually none of the...
simple-system languages. - -sche (discuss) 03:12, 3 October 2011 (UTC) Thanks! —RuakhTALK 03:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC) Statement of legislative intent: It...
(talk) 11:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC) In the examples, you should probably mention plurals too. Unless I missed it. Ƿidsiþ 12:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC) Vahagn Petrosyan...