10 Results found for "Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl-2012-02".

Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2012-02/Brand names and physical product

Disregarding the wider issue of whether to include brands or not, this proposal seems eminently sensible. Why include only brands for non-physical things? Physicality has never seemed relevant to me. Equinox ◑ 17:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC) I agree that, if brands are so stringently regulated, it is unclear why the physicality should make a difference for inclusion. But as I disagree with brands being so stringently and at the same time so complexly regulated, with disregard of lexicographical merit of entries (etymology, pronunciation, inflection, semantics in case of brands of pharmaceuticals, which are often used more often than the generic names), I am likely to oppose just to keep the scope of this harmful regulation as small as possible. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:10, 26 February 2012 (UTC)