to reflect the technical reality and avoid contradiction. —Michael Z. 2012-04-02 19:57 z The POS headers "Abbreviation", "Acronym" and "Initialism" are...
between policy pages and common practice. As an example, Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Patronymics_and_stylistic_edits_of_CFI is a perfect way to go about...
about the phrasebook in their vote comments, to help shape further votes. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:49, 5 December 2012 (UTC) in a appendix is not very...
been left unspecified. As someone pointed out in the previous vote (Wiktionary:Votes/2012-04/Languages with limited documentation), endangered languages...
out of concern that the question might arise "option 1 has 6 votes, option 2 has 2 votes, and the status quo has 3... does option one pass because it...
DCDuring TALK 18:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC) And indeed, [[coal mine]] had already passed RFD by the time [[Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-12/Unidiomatic multi-word...
national trademarks old vote: Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-02/Trademark designations (placed here by : - -sche (discuss) 04:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)) The old, possibly...
votes are Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2013-10/Removing SAMPA and X-SAMPA, Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-05/Names of specific entities or Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Brand...
vote page is needed as well; I'm not sure. The one contemporaneous usage requirement for extinct languages was discussed at Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl...
--BB12 (talk) 17:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC) This is a duplicate, or an attempted duplicate of the already failed vote Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-05/Attestation...