verb, etc.). The wording should be adjusted to reflect the technical reality and avoid contradiction. —Michael Z. 2012-04-02 19:57 z The POS headers "Abbreviation"...
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Patronymics_and_stylistic_edits_of_CFI is a perfect way to go about fixing minor things, IMHO. If an edit is very minor by the estimation...
translations. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 04:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC) One potential complication with this vote is that some people's opinions will depend...
source has to meet, but the requirement has been left unspecified. As someone pointed out in the previous vote (Wiktionary:Votes/2012-04/Languages with limited...
I included that out of concern that the question might arise "option 1 has 6 votes, option 2 has 2 votes, and the status quo has 3... does option one...
vote page is needed as well; I'm not sure. The one contemporaneous usage requirement for extinct languages was discussed at Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl...
is a duplicate, or an attempted duplicate of the already failed vote Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-05/Attestation of extinct languages. Of course that's over...
is a side issue, not really relevant to this vote, .... my votes on the posts of the main page are the same regarldess of if Im right or wrong about...
Norwegian" on the model of Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-06/Unified Serbo-Croatian, Wiktionary:Votes/2011-09/Unified Tagalog, Wiktionary:Votes/2011-10/Unified...
--Yair rand (talk) 15:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC) Thanks. --Daniel 15:36, 26 March 2012 (UTC) Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-03/ELE text about wikifying language...