transclude this vote on WT:V so it actually gets noticed by a fair amount of people before it starts. --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 15:12, 26 August 2012 (UTC) Didn’t...
did: unpass Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/Removing vote requirements for policy changes create Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-03/Vote requirements for policy...
Furthermore, you got the name wrong (Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Brand names and physical product 2), as your vote is not about "physical product" but rather...
between policy pages and common practice. As an example, Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Patronymics_and_stylistic_edits_of_CFI is a perfect way to go about...
about the phrasebook in their vote comments, to help shape further votes. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:49, 5 December 2012 (UTC) in a appendix is not very...
out of concern that the question might arise "option 1 has 6 votes, option 2 has 2 votes, and the status quo has 3... does option one pass because it...
(talk) 17:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC) This is a duplicate, or an attempted duplicate of the already failed vote Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-05/Attestation of...
votes are Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2013-10/Removing SAMPA and X-SAMPA, Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-05/Names of specific entities or Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Brand...
far as possible, that is, nouns and noun phrases. --Dan Polansky 08:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC) OTOH: Headings that meet the requirement of nominality: Attestation...
struggle to understand its purpose. But with sign languages, Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-08/Wiktionary:About_sign_languages says "relaxes WT:CFI for these rarely...