02:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC) I agree that 汉字 should not have a ==Han script== entry. How would we phrase that as part of the vote? WT:LANGLIST is very...
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2013-03/Japanese Romaji romanization - format and content, which is also about the format. I don't see why we need two votes. --Anatoli...
discuss its conclusions. Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2013-03/Japanese Romaji romanization - format and content This vote was created by Dan Polansky (talk • contribs)...
passing votes are Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2013-10/Removing SAMPA and X-SAMPA, Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-05/Names of specific entities or Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Brand...
see Wiktionary:Language considerations. Rerefences ^ pl-2013-03/Romanization and definition line --Daniel Carrero (talk) 01:37, 17 January 2016 (UTC)...
action since April 13, 2013) Wiktionary:Votes/2016-01/Uncle_G_for_de-sysop Wiktionary:Votes/2017-01/Dominic_for_de-admin Wiktionary:Votes/2017-02/Richardb_for_de-admin...
23:12, 27 September 2013 (UTC) Can we use Wiktionary’s definition of a word or protologism? --Æ&Œ (talk) 01:26, 28 September 2013 (UTC) We can. Per Wiktionary...
years, I feel 5 years is a good period. But from I have seen in desysop votes, there could be support for a much shorter period so I included 2 years...
required. One of the places I mentioned this was in Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl-2016-01/Automated_transliterations. Repeating the ping @Biblbroks, Ivan Štambuk...
is a "failure", "epic" or otherwise: it is the opposite. This vote succeeded in what votes are so good at: show objective verifiable evidence of the scope...