have commented at Wiktionary talk:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/<span class="searchmatch">pl</span>-<span class="searchmatch">2013</span>-<span class="searchmatch">03</span>/<span class="searchmatch">Japanese</span> <span class="searchmatch">Romaji</span> <span class="searchmatch">romanization</span> - <span class="searchmatch">format</span> <span class="searchmatch">and</span> <span class="searchmatch">content</span> that this <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> is unwanted, so I am posting it here...
April <span class="searchmatch">2013</span> (UTC) We already have a <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> - Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/<span class="searchmatch">pl</span>-<span class="searchmatch">2013</span>-<span class="searchmatch">03</span>/<span class="searchmatch">Japanese</span> <span class="searchmatch">Romaji</span> <span class="searchmatch">romanization</span> - <span class="searchmatch">format</span> <span class="searchmatch">and</span> <span class="searchmatch">content</span>, which is also about the <span class="searchmatch">format</span>. I...
(notably, those not working with <span class="searchmatch">Japanese</span>) pushed quite hard for keeping separate templates for {{ja-<span class="searchmatch">romaji</span>}} <span class="searchmatch">and</span> {{ja-<span class="searchmatch">romanization</span> of}}. I still don't understand...
entries also lacked vowels. - -sche (discuss) 23:47, 23 May <span class="searchmatch">2013</span> (UTC) Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/<span class="searchmatch">pl</span>-2014-04/Unified Chinese is starting tomorrow. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад)...
answer. What <span class="searchmatch">formatting</span> is required to show that an adverb is missing the superlative form, whilst still showing it has a comparative <span class="searchmatch">and</span> vice versa? An...