This will be superfluous if and when Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-04/Keeping common misspellings passes. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:28, 24 August 2014 (UTC)...
currently-ongoing votes. - -sche (discuss) 01:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC) Thanks. It has now been mentioned in the vote itself. Wyang (talk) 03:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)...
2014 (UTC) Do you agree that the status quo is that Wiktionary keeps common mispellings in the mainspace? --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:43, 5 April 2014 (UTC)...
the existence of Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-04/Keeping common misspellings is no evidence for the claim that, before the vote, common misspellings were excluded...
March 2014 (UTC) Good idea. It could be "Unified Norwegian" on the model of Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-06/Unified Serbo-Croatian, Wiktionary:Votes/2011-09/Unified...
one uses, such as Joyce's "bababadalgharagh...". In Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-04/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work, there was the objection that...
is this vote 3 months long? I find that excessive. --{{victar|talk}} 08:33, 25 January 2019 (UTC) It is because it took Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-07/Allowing...
Polansky (talk) 16:58, 9 June 2014 (UTC) Support. — Ungoliant (falai) 17:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC) Good idea. I've modified the vote's wording accordingly. - -sche...
become uneditable, the exact text can be said in the other vote (like Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-13/Make WT:BOT uneditable) and it probably would copy whatever...
anyway. Though this is a side issue, not really relevant to this vote, .... my votes on the posts of the main page are the same regarldess of if Im right...