Warning: Undefined variable $resultados in /home/enciclo/public_html/dictious.com/search.php on line 17
Wiktionary_talk%3AVotes%2Fpl-2014-06%2FAllowing_attested_romanizations - Dictious

10 Results found for " Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl-2014-06/Allowing_attested_romanizations"

Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-06/Allowing attested romanizations

vote is simple by design. By contrast, Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/<span class="searchmatch">pl</span>-<span class="searchmatch">2014</span>-<span class="searchmatch">06</span>/<span class="searchmatch">Allowing</span> <span class="searchmatch">attested</span> <span class="searchmatch">romanizations</span> may fail over a disagreement over wording and its implications...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-06/Excluding romanizations by default

pl-2014-06/Allowing attested <span class="searchmatch">romanizations</span> at [[Wiktionary talk:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/<span class="searchmatch">pl</span>-<span class="searchmatch">2014</span>-<span class="searchmatch">06</span>/<span class="searchmatch">Allowing</span> <span class="searchmatch">attested</span> <span class="searchmatch">romanizations</span>#merge the <span class="searchmatch">votes</span>]]; please comment there.​—msh210℠...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-06/Romanization of Sanskrit

21:15, 30 June <span class="searchmatch">2014</span> (UTC) Is this a proposal to <span class="searchmatch">allow</span> <span class="searchmatch">romanizations</span> of all Sanskrit terms, irrespective of whether the <span class="searchmatch">romanization</span> is <span class="searchmatch">attested</span>? bd2412 T 14:15...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-07/Redirecting attested romanizations

we would want an <span class="searchmatch">attested</span> <span class="searchmatch">romanization</span> redirecting to an entry and not also being noted in that entry. bd2412 T 23:25, 14 August <span class="searchmatch">2014</span> (UTC) @DCDuring There&#039;s...


Wiktionary talk:About Chinese

May 2013 (UTC) Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/<span class="searchmatch">pl</span>-<span class="searchmatch">2014</span>-04/Unified Chinese is starting tomorrow. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 00:45, 28 March <span class="searchmatch">2014</span> (UTC) Hi, @Tooironic, @Jamesjiao...


Wiktionary talk:About Hebrew/archives/2016

(as the operator of an interwiki bot, according to -sche in Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/<span class="searchmatch">pl</span>-2015-05/Normalization of entries#Oppose). — I.S.M.E.T.A. 16:13, 14 June...


Wiktionary talk:About Japanese

different relations. Regardless of the status of <span class="searchmatch">romanizations</span> as &quot;spellings&quot;, official, or unofficial, <span class="searchmatch">romanizations</span> are clearly written forms, not spoken forms...


Wiktionary talk:About Arabic

have m <span class="searchmatch">pl</span> inan, m <span class="searchmatch">pl</span> anim, f <span class="searchmatch">pl</span> inan, and f <span class="searchmatch">pl</span> anim. We should also mark the animacy for all singular nouns that have plurals. --WikiTiki89 16:<span class="searchmatch">06</span>, 22 June...


Wiktionary talk:About Latin/Archive 2

may be wrong, but I doubt the <span class="searchmatch">Romans</span> used these marks. My feeling is that these marks are <span class="searchmatch">attested</span> later than what we <span class="searchmatch">allow</span> for attestation of Latin words...


Wiktionary talk:Language treatment

Wiktionary doesn&#039;t have to apologise on every page on how it works. The <span class="searchmatch">votes</span> on Chinese and Serbo-Croatian unifications defined the dictionary policies...