pl-2014-06/Allowing attested <span class="searchmatch">romanizations</span> at [[Wiktionary talk:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/<span class="searchmatch">pl</span>-<span class="searchmatch">2014</span>-<span class="searchmatch">06</span>/Allowing attested <span class="searchmatch">romanizations</span>#merge the <span class="searchmatch">votes</span>]]; please comment there.—msh210℠...
17:19, 16 June <span class="searchmatch">2014</span> (UTC) Discussion has continued at [[Wiktionary talk:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/<span class="searchmatch">pl</span>-<span class="searchmatch">2014</span>-<span class="searchmatch">06</span>/<span class="searchmatch">Excluding</span> <span class="searchmatch">romanizations</span> <span class="searchmatch">by</span> <span class="searchmatch">default</span>#merge the <span class="searchmatch">votes</span>]].—msh210℠ (talk)...
Wiktionary’s <span class="searchmatch">default</span> 13px font-size, the half rings look rather like identical vertical ticks. —Michael Z. 2013-11-<span class="searchmatch">06</span> 05:28 z Half rings ʾ and ʿ are used <span class="searchmatch">by</span> DIN...
means that words are usually still spelt the same in the Arabic script. (<span class="searchmatch">Excluding</span> the names of newer technologies and countries which are usually unrelated)...
iterate I am much more in favor of not putting <span class="searchmatch">romanizations</span> in the header at all, the <span class="searchmatch">romanizations</span> listed in fa-IPA are more detailed anyway. But 1)...
in favor of <span class="searchmatch">excluding</span> the compounds is that they are SOP. An argument in favor of having them is that they're single words in post-<span class="searchmatch">Roman</span> texts, i.e. texts...