case. It should only apply to RfD. —CodeCat 14:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC) OK, I'll change it to just RfD. Purplebackpack89 14:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)...
17:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Discussion has continued at [[Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-06/Excluding romanizations by default#merge the votes]].—msh210℠ (talk)...
talk:Votes/pl-2014-06/Allowing attested romanizations#merge the votes]]; please comment there.—msh210℠ (talk) 17:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC) I think the votes...
March 2014 (UTC) Good idea. It could be "Unified Norwegian" on the model of Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-06/Unified Serbo-Croatian, Wiktionary:Votes/2011-09/Unified...
no one uses, such as Joyce's "bababadalgharagh...". In Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-04/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work, there was the objection...
currently-ongoing votes. - -sche (discuss) 01:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC) Thanks. It has now been mentioned in the vote itself. Wyang (talk) 03:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)...
is this vote 3 months long? I find that excessive. --{{victar|talk}} 08:33, 25 January 2019 (UTC) It is because it took Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-07/Allowing...
Cyrillic an alternative script for Latin? --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 03:20, 11 June 2014 (UTC) I'm not trying to promote a POV at all, merely raise awareness...
become uneditable, the exact text can be said in the other vote (like Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-13/Make WT:BOT uneditable) and it probably would copy whatever...
TALK 11:33, 5 April 2014 (UTC) Do you agree that the status quo is that Wiktionary keeps common mispellings in the mainspace? --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:43...