Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-11/Require third-party closures of RfD discussions

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-11/Require third-party closures of RfD discussions. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-11/Require third-party closures of RfD discussions, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-11/Require third-party closures of RfD discussions in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-11/Require third-party closures of RfD discussions you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-11/Require third-party closures of RfD discussions will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-11/Require third-party closures of RfD discussions, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Not necessary for RfV

RfVs are not discussions so the outcome is not really open to interpretation. Either there are enough citations or there aren't. So this requirement doesn't fit in that case. It should only apply to RfD. —CodeCat 14:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

OK, I'll change it to just RfD. Purplebackpack89 14:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply