Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2015-12/Definitions

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2015-12/Definitions. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2015-12/Definitions, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2015-12/Definitions in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2015-12/Definitions you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2015-12/Definitions will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2015-12/Definitions, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Issues

This seems to condone or require the use of {{context}} as a context label, when instead we'd like to promote {{label}} so that the language code cannot be omitted. Additionally, the bit about italicisation is extremely misleading, considering that we actually use a template, {{plural of}}, to do that, and I think it should be removed. @Daniel Carrero, since you're the only person who has voted, I reckon you can change these things if you wish. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:54, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Metaknowledge: I un-started the vote.
  1. It's true, what you said about italicization. I rewrote that part, what do you think? The text still mentions what is bold and what is italic because that was decided by vote, but now it's clear that it's the job of the template to format the text that way.
  2. I scheduled the vote to start on January 18. Wiktionary:Votes/2015-11/term → m; context → label; usex → ux ends on January 16, so we'll have an official position on {{context}} versus {{label}} (not to forget {{lb}}, which is my personal markup choice, and also other editors'). I'll edit the current vote after the other ends.
--Daniel Carrero (talk) 08:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I think that's a good idea. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 08:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Diff

Reminder to myself:

Update the diff before (re-)starting the vote. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 09:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply