by the design and implementation of templates"? DCDuring TALK 16:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC) My opinion is: For undecided and undiscussed matters, we can...
withdrawing the votes that are clearly going to fail, but only 1 does seem to fit: Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-01/Pronunciation Other votes either look like...
the pronunciation with more varieties? --Daniel Carrero (talk) 02:16, 3 February 2016 (UTC) The entry shows both /ˈkɛɹət/ and /ˈkæɹət/ as GA pronunciations...
2016 (UTC) Should we carry on with this vote as-is and vote for removing "idiomatic" later, or should this vote be edited somehow to avoid using "idiomatic"...
References ^ Wiktionary:Votes/2006-12/form-of style ^ Wiktionary:Votes/2010-08/Italicizing use-with-mention ^ Wiktionary:Votes/2016-09/Definitions — non-lemma...
pronunciation sections should be gone by now, as some users have been removing them from entries. One should be able to use the last dump at least to...
Wouldn't that get kind of repetitive? PseudoSkull (talk) 02:00, 1 October 2016 (UTC) If this vote passes and people want to keep these entries with a single...
Wiktionary:Votes/2016-01/Uncle_G_for_de-sysop Wiktionary:Votes/2017-01/Dominic_for_de-admin Wiktionary:Votes/2017-02/Richardb_for_de-admin Wiktionary:Votes/2018-01/Conrad...
21:02, 18 December 2015 (UTC) If this vote passes, what happens with Wiktionary:Entry layout/POS headers? --Droigheann (talk) 20:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)...
anyway. Though this is a side issue, not really relevant to this vote, .... my votes on the posts of the main page are the same regarldess of if Im right...