10 Results found for "Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl-2016-10".

Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-10/CFI and idiomaticity clarification

6 October 2016 (UTC) I don't mean just in this vote, I mean that this vote inspired me to propose this. --WikiTiki89 21:21, 6 October 2016 (UTC) Should...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-08/Definitions — introduction

--Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC) About the question 1: the previous vote was Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2015-12/Definitions. In retrospect, I...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-01/Pronunciation

—Aɴɢʀ (talk) 10:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Support --WikiTiki89 15:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC) Support —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 10:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Comment:...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-07/Pronunciation 2

comment/vote either on Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-01/Pronunciation or the respective talk page. I hope I didn't miss anyone. This new vote is scheduled to start in...


Wiktionary talk:Entry layout/Editable

User:Msh210/ELE Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 1 Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 2 Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/ELE Amendment 3 How...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/2016-09/Definitions — non-lemma

References ^ Wiktionary:Votes/2006-12/form-of style ^ Wiktionary:Votes/2010-08/Italicizing use-with-mention ^ Wiktionary:Votes/2016-09/Definitions — non-lemma...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-01/Automated transliterations

10:29, 9 March 2016 (UTC) That's a good idea, but that's not what this discussion and Dixtosa's question was about. --WikiTiki89 23:47, 8 March 2016 (UTC)...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2015-12/Translations

00:16, 21 January 2016 (UTC) Point #1: Fixed. Point #2: True. I don't know if we can simply edit the vote right now to fix that. This vote already has a proposed...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-01/Translations of taxonomic names

mass addition of unpopulated translation tables. DCDuring TALK 23:20, 10 February 2016 (UTC) Mass addition of unpopulated translation tables would have at...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2015-12/Etymology

after "Etymology 1" is already explained a bit more in-depth in Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2015-12/Headings, so I think the etymology section does not need to repeat...