10 Results found for "Wiktionary_talk:Votes/pl-2017-04".

Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2017-04/Removing inactive editors from user-proficiency categories

Is the Babel template really the place to put "inactive" status? We've been debating other inactive things, like removing admin rights, so perhaps inactivity status should be stored in a more general way. Equinox ◑ 18:25, 23 April 2017 (UTC) @Equinox: It never even occurred to me that that might be a possibility. Such a thing would be very efficient and preferable to my method, I agree. But is it possible? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 12:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC) I thought perhaps the bot could just add an inactive=yes template to the user page, or some such thing. I don't know much about what's possible, and whether language proficiency templates could then pick that up and react to it. Equinox ◑ 19:48, 25 April 2017 (UTC) Can it be stored in a more general way that can be queried by templates? --WikiTiki89 20:42, 25 April 2017 (UTC) @Equinox, Wikitiki89: The great white hope is that templates and/or modules might be able to query Special:Contributions directly. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 22:13, 25 April 2017 (UTC)