Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2017-04/Well documented languages and constructed languages

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2017-04/Well documented languages and constructed languages. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2017-04/Well documented languages and constructed languages, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2017-04/Well documented languages and constructed languages in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2017-04/Well documented languages and constructed languages you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2017-04/Well documented languages and constructed languages will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2017-04/Well documented languages and constructed languages, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Rationale

Some time ago, I did not notice Esperato was a Well Documented Language because it was not on the list; I was probably too tired. Recently, someone at WT:RFV#More Volapük scientists and academics also did not notice. A bit of added explicitness should help this.

A disadvantage of this is that it duplicates information and creates a potential maintenance overhead. To limit that downside, I end the item with "and any other constructed language indicated as approved at Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion#Constructed languages" so a potential incompleteness arising later does not harm. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply