apricot tree, so I don't see that this vote would save the latter entry. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC) On the requests for deletion page...
What should be done about this stillborn of a vote? SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 15:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)...
created Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2017-06/Modern Latin as a LDL or extinct language to (hopefully) answer that question in the event this vote fails. - -sche (discuss)...
proposed. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC) A further note: Based on Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/Clarification of language inclusion, it...
just repeats something said at the "Translations" section. See Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2015-12/Translations. "English entries should have a "Translations" section...
desysop votes, there could be support for a much shorter period so I included 2 years in the proposal as well. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)...
27 June 2017 (UTC) I'd support letting bots add the spaces. I like entries to be standardized too. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 18:09, 27 June 2017 (UTC)...
09:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC) I replaced word formulation with "that is >= 0 and <= 100" for brevity; I hope it is clear enough. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:38...
"meaning" or "substance" or "essence". This, that and the other (talk) 09:55, 9 July 2017 (UTC) @This, that and the other: I edited that line now. It now reads:...
complicated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:27, 15 November 2017 (UTC) Thanks for drafting this vote. The main thing I wish to avoid is reduplication. That's...