Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2018-12/Phrasebook CFI

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2018-12/Phrasebook CFI. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2018-12/Phrasebook CFI, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2018-12/Phrasebook CFI in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2018-12/Phrasebook CFI you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2018-12/Phrasebook CFI will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2018-12/Phrasebook CFI, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Rationale

Phrasebook entries can be very useful but there is a fear that useless entries defended as phrasebook ones will flood the mainspace. By requiring English phrasebook entries to be in other phrasebooks, we put limit on phrasebook entries, doing so with the help of an easy-to-verify criterion.

The lemming idea (being in other phrasebooks) is not applied to non-English entries since these may have too hard a time being found in phrasebooks, as pointed out by the opposition in Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-10/Phrasebook CFI.

Why "it can only be included if consensus grants an exception": This is an express override option allowing inclusion of English terms that are not in phrasebooks. Absent lemmings, the hurdle to overcome for inclusion is consensus (usually 2/3 majority), reflecting that phrasebook is controversial per Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-12/Removing phrasebook.

--Dan Polansky (talk) 09:18, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

"Summation of its parts"

Just a minor point: I think "sum" would work better. "Summation" sounds more mathematical and suggests an addition process rather than the result of adding things together. Equinox 13:00, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Luckily, it is in the old text, not in the proposed text. Still, valuable info. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Reply