Wiktionary talk:Votes/sy-2012-05/User:Connel MacKenzie for de-sysop and de-checkuser
No, my account has not been compromised. Interesting that a person with vehement personal conflict (of their own design) initiates the proposal. Very, very interesting. --Connel MacKenzie (talk) 02:06, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
No one's saying it has. The point of desysopping inactive admins is to safeguard against the possibility of their account becoming compromised at some point in the future. For the same reason, over at Wikipedia I have indef-blocked deceased users. Not because I'm worried their ghost will vandalize the encyclopedia, but because I don't want someone hacking into their account. I don't know (or care) what "vehement personal conflict" you feel Ruakh has, but I do want to know whether you want to stay a sysop and checkuser here or not. —Angr 09:00, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
I don't particularly want to dig through the edit history, but someone had suggested my account had been compromised, so I clarified that. Yes, I would prefer to keep my former status. --Connel MacKenzie (talk) 05:40, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Perhaps a more relevant question would be, do you intend to resume editing at any point? -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 11:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)