Wiktionary talk:Word of the day/Nominations/Archive 2011

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary talk:Word of the day/Nominations/Archive 2011. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary talk:Word of the day/Nominations/Archive 2011, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary talk:Word of the day/Nominations/Archive 2011 in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary talk:Word of the day/Nominations/Archive 2011 you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary talk:Word of the day/Nominations/Archive 2011 will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary talk:Word of the day/Nominations/Archive 2011, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Lint errors

To correct

Please replace the project page with Wiktionary:Word of the day/Nominations/Sandbox.

Note that the entry variadic has an <s> tag improperly closed with another <s> instead of </s>, and as a result, under the new linter software, every line following variadic is struck, even though this was neither the intent nor the appearance of those lines under the old linter software. To see this, edit the sandbox page with

https://en.wiktionary.orghttps://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Wiktionary:Word_of_the_day/Nominations/Sandbox&action=parsermigration-edit

and on the variadic entry, remove the slash from </s> and click Show preview. Then search for variadic and see how on the right ("New"), every line after variadic is struck, while on the left, not so. Don't save the edit; this is just to help understand the issue. Replacing the project page with the sandbox will fix this problem and restore the appearance of the page to what the users intended and had seen until now. Anomalocaris (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Done Done. @Anomalocaris: in future, why not just make the correction yourself? — SGconlaw (talk) 02:53, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
SGconlaw: Thanks! At the time, the page was protected and only admins could edit it. —Anomalocaris (talk) 03:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Funny, someone must have unprotected it between the time you posted your message and when I looked at it and edited it today. — SGconlaw (talk) 03:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply