anthropophagi

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word anthropophagi. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word anthropophagi, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say anthropophagi in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word anthropophagi you have here. The definition of the word anthropophagi will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofanthropophagi, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

English

English Wikipedia has an article on:
Wikipedia

Etymology

From Latin anthrōpophagī, the plural of anthrōpophagus, from Ancient Greek ἀνθρωποφάγος (anthrōpophágos, man-eating). First attested in 1581, as an ethnonym. Use of the singular anthropophagus is rare.

Noun

anthropophagi

  1. plural of anthropophagus
    • 1581, B. Gilpin, A godly sermon preached in the court at Greenwich:
      Histories make mention of a people called Anthropophagi, eaters of men.
    • c. 1603–1604 (date written), William Shakespeare, The Tragœdy of Othello, the Moore of Venice.  (First Quarto), London: N O for Thomas Walkley, , published 1622, →OCLC, , page 13:
      It was my hent to ſpeake, ſuch was the proceſſe:
      And of the Cannibals, that each other eate;
      The Anthropophagie, and men whoſe heads
      Doe grow beneath their ſhoulders: []
    • 1837, J. D. Lang, An historical and statistical account of New South Wales, I. 386:
      A poor New Zealander, whose forefathers had from time immemorial been anthropophagi.

Alternative forms

  • Anthropophagi (capitalized as the name of a supposed people of man-eaters in ancient ethnography)

Derived terms

Latin

Noun

anthrōpophagī

  1. inflection of anthrōpophagus:
    1. nominative/vocative plural
    2. genitive singular

References

  • anthropophagi”, in Harry Thurston Peck, editor (1898), Harper's Dictionary of Classical Antiquities, New York: Harper & Brothers