back-of-an-envelope

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word back-of-an-envelope. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word back-of-an-envelope, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say back-of-an-envelope in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word back-of-an-envelope you have here. The definition of the word back-of-an-envelope will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofback-of-an-envelope, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

English

Adjective

back-of-an-envelope (not comparable)

  1. Alternative form of back-of-the-envelope
    • 1979 February 22, Thomas F[rancis] Eagleton, “Department of Labor: Labor-management Services Administration: Statement of Jack A. Warshaw, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Labor-management Relations ”, in Departments of Labor and Health, Education and Welfare and Related Agencies Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1980: Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, Ninety-sixth Congress, First Session: Part 1 , Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, →OCLC, page 464:
      On one defense item, somebody kept referring to it as a back-of-an-envelope cost estimate. Do you have a back-on-an-envelope cost estimate?
    • 1996, T[homas] W[illiam] Körner, “Biology in a Darkened Room”, in The Pleasures of Counting, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press, published 2002, →ISBN, part II (Meditations on Measurement), pages 112–113:
      The reader will not need to be warned that the calculations involved are of the back of an envelope type and statements of the form ‘a equals b’ should be read ‘a equals b approximately’ or even ‘with a bit of luck, a and b will be of the same order of magnitude’.
    • 1998, Paul Lawrence Rose, “The Bomb as Reactor: The U235 Bomb Misconceived, 1940”, in Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project: A Study in German Culture, Berkeley; Los Angeles, Calif.; London: University of California Press, →ISBN, page 115:
      Misapplying a basic feature of diffusion theory, [Werner] Heisenberg arrived at an impossibly high figure for a critical mass of pure U235. This was done by means of a seductively simple "back of an envelope" calculation in 1940, []