diastratic

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word diastratic. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word diastratic, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say diastratic in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word diastratic you have here. The definition of the word diastratic will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofdiastratic, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

English

Etymology

From dia- +‎ stratic.

Adjective

diastratic (not comparable)

  1. (lexicography) Concerned with or relating to the ways in which language varies across social, cultural or educational factors.
    a diastratic usage label
    • 1991, “Lexicography”, in Kirsten Malmkjær, editor, The Linguistics Encyclopedia, London, New York, N.Y.: Routledge, →ISBN, page 295, column 2:
      According to Hausmann (1977, Ch. 8), lexically relevant units can receive — typically by means of labels or usage notes — any or all of the following types of diasystematic marking: diachronic (e.g. archaic, neologism); diatopic (e.g. American English for elevator 'lift', British English for loo); diaintegrative for foreign borrowings used in English (e.g. German for Weltanschauung); diastratic (e.g. informal for loo, formal for perambulator); diaconnotative (e.g. from Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (W9), often used disparagingly for dyke); diatechnical (e.g. law for tort, anatomy for clavicle; diafrequential (e.g. rare); dianormative (e.g. substandard for ain't).
    • 2000, Gregory James, Colporuḷ: A History of Tamil Dictionaries, Chennai: Cre-A, →ISBN, page 266:
      The eschewing of Grantha letters despite their widespread use in modern Tamil, and the unnecessary diastratic and dianormative labelling of many common items as 'non-standard', echo traditional views that the language needs to be 'protected' against the innovations of ordinary everyday speech.