Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
esquamulose. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
esquamulose, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
esquamulose in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
esquamulose you have here. The definition of the word
esquamulose will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
esquamulose, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
English
Etymology
From e- (prefix forming adjectives with the sense of lacking something) + squamulose; squamulose is derived from New Latin squāmulōsus (“squamulose”), from Latin squamula (“small scales”) (diminutive of squāma (“scale of a fish or reptile; item shaped like a scale, flake”)) + -ōsus (suffix meaning ‘full of, prone to’).[1][2] The English word is analysable as e- + squamula + -ose.
Pronunciation
Adjective
esquamulose (not comparable)
- (botany, mycology) Not covered in scales or scale-like objects; having a smooth skin or outer covering.
- Synonym: scaleless
- Antonyms: scaly, squamose, squamous, squamulose
1884, Lucien M Underwood, “Article I.—Descriptive Catalogue of the North American Hepaticæ, North of Mexico”, in Bulletin of the Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History, Normal, Illinois, volume II, Peoria, Ill.: J. W. Franks & Sons, printers and binders, →OCLC, order II (Marchantiaceæ Corda.), section VII (Dumortiera Nees.), paragraph 1, page 38:D[umortiera] hirsuta Nees. Diœcious; thallus 5–15 cm. long, 1.3–2 cm. wide, thin, deep-green, becoming blackish, plane and entire on the margins, exareolate and naked, or sometimes with a delicate, coarsely reticulated, closely appressed, cobweb-like pubescence above, hirsute and esquamulose beneath; [...]
1890 February 5, George King, “VIII.—Materials for a Flora of the Malayan Peninsula.”, in Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, volume LIX, part II (Natural Science), number 2, Calcutta: Printed at the Baptist Mission Press, →OCLC, order XV (Ternstrœmiaceæ), section 6 (Saurauja, Willd.), page 198:Saurauja nudiflora, [...]. A tree 20 to 30 feet high; youngest branchlets dark-coloured, squamulose towards the apex; the older esquamulose, pale, faintly striate.
1894, James M Crombie, A Monograph of Lichens Found in Britain: Being a Descriptive Catalogue of the Species in the Herbarium of the British Museum, London: Printed by order of the Trustees , →OCLC, page 164:Hookeri [...] In the only British specimen seen these are about 1 in. high, robust, entirely esquamulose, with the apothecia somewhat large, conglomerate, and having a few minute squamules intermixed.
1909 January, G. K. Merrill, “Lichen Notes No. 7. Cladonia multiformis (nom. nov.) Bry. 6: 1908.”, in Annie Morrill Smith, editor, The Bryologist: An Illustrated Bimonthly Devoted to North American Mosses, Hepatics and Lichens, volume XII, number 1, New York, N.Y.: Published by the editor, , →OCLC, page 4:Cladonia multiformis. [...] Podetia irregularly sub-cylindrical at the base, commonly entire but sometimes fissured and gaping, slender or stout, simple or pseudo-branched by obliteration of an early scyphus, esquamulose or more or less leafy throughout, [...]
1974, D. C. Lindsay, “Systematic Account”, in The Macrolichens of South Georgia (British Antarctic Survey Scientific Reports; no. 89), London: British Antarctic Survey, National Environment Research Council, →OCLC, archived from the original on 19 February 2019, section 14 (Descriptions of Genera and Species), page 22:Both subspecies may superficially resemble C. furcata var. furcata, but can be distinguished by the imperforate axils and esquamulose podetia.
Translations
not covered in scales or scale-like objects
References
- ^ “e-, prefix2”, in OED Online , Oxford: Oxford University Press, January 2018; “e-”, in Lexico, Dictionary.com; Oxford University Press, 2019–2022.
- ^ Compare “squamulose, adj.”, in OED Online , Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1915.
Further reading