Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
gerund-participle. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
gerund-participle, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
gerund-participle in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
gerund-participle you have here. The definition of the word
gerund-participle will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
gerund-participle, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
English
Noun
gerund-participle (plural gerund-participles)
- (grammar) The form of an English verb that ends in -ing and can function as a noun, an adjective, or a progressive verb.
- Synonym: ing-form
- Hypernyms: wordform < form
- Near-synonyms: (in other operational definitions) gerund, present participle
2005, Rodney Huddleston, Geoffrey K. Pullum, A Student's Introduction to English Grammar:The gerund-participle ¶ Traditionally (for example, in the grammar of Latin), a gerund is a verb-form that is functionally similar to a noun, whereas a participle is one that is functionally similar to an adjective.
2005, Patrick J. Duffley, The English gerund-participle in cognitive grammar:THE TERM 'GERUND-PARTICIPLE' used in the title of this paper is adopted from Huddleston and Pullum (2002:80), who see no reason to give priority to one or the other of the traditional terms used to refer to the verbal uses of the English -ing form illustrated in (1):
2009, Frank Boers, Jeroen Darquennes, Koen Kerremans, Multilingualism and Applied Comparative Linguistics:The intralinguistic analysis carried out on our sample has revealed that, on average, the English gerund-participle is frequently used to realize circumstance adverbials, which may express a great variety of semantic roles.
2010, Mark Liberman, “Gerunds vs. participles”, in Language Log:Therefore I was happy when Geoffrey Pullum and Rodney Huddleston, in the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, presented a clear and compelling argument that "A distinction between gerund and present participle can't be sustained" (pp. 80-83 and 1220-1222). They therefore use the merged category "gerund-participle".
2014, Patrick Duffley, Reclaiming Control as a Semantic and Pragmatic Phenomenon:This amounted to 176 occurrences of the gerund-participle and 49 of the to-infinitive, an interesting statistic in itself, as it confirms the more noun-like character of the gerund-participle, ...
Further reading