indict a ham sandwich

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word indict a ham sandwich. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word indict a ham sandwich, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say indict a ham sandwich in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word indict a ham sandwich you have here. The definition of the word indict a ham sandwich will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofindict a ham sandwich, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

English

Pronunciation

  • IPA(key): /ɪnˈdaɪt ə ˈhæm ˈsændwɪtʃ/
  • (file)

Verb

indict a ham sandwich (third-person singular simple present indicts a ham sandwich, present participle indicting a ham sandwich, simple past and past participle indicted a ham sandwich)

  1. (chiefly US, law, hyperbolic) To charge (someone) with a crime with ease, despite the innocence of the accused party, a lack of evidence to secure an indictment, etc.
    • 2023 March 31, Maria Cramer, “Here’s how indictments work in the United States’ legal system”, in The New York Times:
      That one-sided arrangement often leads defense lawyers to minimize indictments and argue that prosecutors could persuade jurors to “indict a ham sandwich,” a proverbial phrase that former Vice President Mike Pence used on CNN Thursday night.
    • 2022 April 14, Ariana Garcia, “Harris Co. Judge Lina Hidalgo on staff indictments: 'A grand jury can indict a ham sandwich”, in Chron:
      When asked in an interview Thursday with ABC13 if she was worried about being indicted herself, Hidalgo responded "I don't know how far this is going to go and it's very easy if you present one-sided facts to a grand jury. Everybody knows that a grand jury can indict a ham sandwich if that's all they see."

Usage notes

  • Used hyperbolically to suggest how easy it is to indict someone, and that a mere indictment is not probative of guilt.