pathetic fallacy
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word pathetic fallacy. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word pathetic fallacy, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say pathetic fallacy in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word pathetic fallacy you have here. The definition of the word pathetic fallacy will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofpathetic fallacy, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
English
Etymology
Coined by British cultural critic John Ruskin in 1856 in his work Modern Painters. Here, fallacy does not refer to a logical fallacy, but should be understood as “a falsehood, something that is untrue”, while pathetic here means “caused by an excited state of the feelings”;[1] thus, "emotional misrepresentation", not "contemptible illogic".
Noun
| Examples |
|---|
pathetic fallacy (plural pathetic fallacies)
- A metaphor which consists in treating inanimate objects or concepts as if they were human beings, for instance having thoughts or feelings.
- 1856, John Ruskin, chapter XII, in Modern Painters , volume III, London: Smith, Elder and Co., , →OCLC, part IV (Of Many Things), § 2, page 184:
- Taking, therefore, this wide field, it is surely a very notable circumstance, to begin with, that this pathetic fallacy is eminently characteristic of modern painting. For instance, Keats, describing a wave, breaking, out at sea, says of it
Down whose green back the short-lived foam, all hoar,
Bursts gradual, with a wayward indolence.
- 2022 June 14, Ian Bogost, “Google’s ‘Sentient’ Chatbot Is Our Self-Deceiving Future”, in The Atlantic:
- The next generation of AI will put the pathetic fallacy on steroids.
See also
References
- ^ John Ruskin (1856) “Chapter XII. Of the Pathetic Fallacy”, in Modern Painters, volume III (part IV), § 5, page 170: “t is the fallacy of wilful fancy, which involves no real expectation that it will be believed; or else it is a fallacy caused by an excited state of the feelings, making us, for the time, more or less irrational.”