supererogation

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word supererogation. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word supererogation, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say supererogation in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word supererogation you have here. The definition of the word supererogation will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofsupererogation, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

English

English Wikipedia has an article on:
Wikipedia

Etymology

From Late Latin superērogātiō (payment in addition), from superērogāre (to pay in addition), from super (in addition to) + ērogāre (to pay, pay out, expend, disburse), equivalent to supererogate +‎ -ion.

Pronunciation

Noun

supererogation (countable and uncountable, plural supererogations)

  1. An act of doing more than is required.
  2. (philosophy) An action that is neither morally forbidden nor required, but has moral value.
    • 1982, John P. Reeder, Jr., “Beneficence, Supererogation, and Role Duty”, in Earl E. Shelp, editor, Beneficence and Health Care (Philosophy and Medicine; 11), Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, →DOI, →ISBN, page 93:
      For now let us look at the supererogation which would be contrasted with mutual aid. [] here would be two fundamental types of supererogation. Supererogation 1 focuses on the same sorts of situations and the same sorts of aid covered by mutual aid, but removes the limit on the cost to the giver: [] Supererogation number 2 focuses not on situations where basic needs are threatened, but on well-being, []
    • 1992, Phillip Montague, “Beneficence and Supererogation”, in In the Interests of Others: An Essay in Moral Philosophy (Philosophical Studies; 55), Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, →DOI, →ISBN:
      According to standard definitions of supererogation, acts are supererogatory if and only if they are neither morally obligatory nor morally prohibited, but nevertheless have moral value (are morally good, etc.).
    • 2001, Robert M. Timko, Clinical Ethics: Due Care and the Principle of Nonmaleficence, Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, →ISBN, pages 120–121:
      Exposing one's self to a severely communicable disease in order to alleviate that individual's suffering, e.g., working in a tubercular ward in the early part of this century, or working in an AIDS hospice today, could be seen as supererogations of type one. Providing cosmetic surgery, not as the repair of a disfigurement caused by accident or injury, but simply to enhance one's features, or providing Human Growth Hormone so one may not be considered short, would be examples of supererogations of type two.
    • 2016 spring, David Heyd, “Supererogation”, in Edward N. Zalta, editor, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
      Supererogation is the technical term for the class of actions that go “beyond the call of duty.” Roughly speaking, supererogatory acts are morally good although not (strictly) required. [] Surprisingly, the history of supererogation in non-religious ethical theory is fairly recent, starting only in 1958 with J. O. Urmson's seminal article, “Saints and Heroes.”

Derived terms

See also