않다

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word 않다. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word 않다, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say 않다 in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word 않다 you have here. The definition of the word 않다 will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of않다, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Korean

Etymology

Contraction of 아니하다 (anihada).

Pronunciation

Romanizations
Revised Romanization?anta
Revised Romanization (translit.)?anhda
McCune–Reischauer?ant'a
Yale Romanization?anhta

Adjective

않다 (anta) (infinitive 않아, sequential 않으니)

  1. (adjective 않다 (-ji anta)) auxiliary adjective used to negate the clause to which the main adjective belongs
    어렵지 않은 수업
    eoryeop-ji aneun sueop
    a lesson which is not difficult

Conjugation

Verb

않다 (anta) (infinitive 않아, sequential 않으니)

  1. (verb- 않다) auxiliary verb used to negate the clause to which the main verb belongs
    듣지 않는 수업
    deutji anneun sueop
    a lesson which do not listen to
  2. (transitive) to not do something
    공부를 않는다.
    gongbu-reul anneunda.
    don't study.
    Audio (South Korea):(file)

Conjugation

Usage notes

않다 (anta) inherits the nature of the main term that it negates. Therefore it behaves as an adjective when it negates an adjective, and behaves as a verb when it negates a verb.

The adverb (an, “not”) is used to negate a verb, and has a more informal connotation. Compare:

Certain terms or expressions have a strong (sometimes obligatory) preference for one negation type or another. For example, adjectives derived from -스럽다 (-seureopda) are usually negated by 않다 (anta), as do inherently negative verbs such as 없다 (eopda, “to not have”) and 모르다 (moreuda, “to not know”). By contrast, negated rhetorical questions obligatorily require (an).

(an, “not”) negates only the verb or adjective, whereas 않다 (anta) negates the entire embedded clause. While this difference is often not semantically meaningful, it can also lead to contrasting meanings, such as when the particle (man, “only”) is involved:

  • 사과 먹어.
    sagwa-man an meogeo.
    Apples are the only thing they don't eat.
  • 사과 먹지 않아.
    sagwa-man meokji ana.
    They don't only eat apples .

In the first case, only the verb 먹다 (meokda, “to eat”) is negated. In the latter, the entire clause 사과-만 먹다 (sagwa-man meokda, “to eat only apples”) is negated.

For a history of this construction, see 不冬.